Don’t Thank The Voters—Thank The Corpses: Gaza’s Unpaid Political Tab

Careful or you’ll end up being worse than the Democratic establishment shills you ran against

So here we are. The air is thick with victory Yeahs and self-congratulatory back-slaps. We’ve got candidates—actual, breathing candidates—winning elections by screaming into the void about billionaires, about bombs, about the whole rotting carcass of the imperial project. They’re getting in on a platform of “eat the rich” and “stop the slaughter,” and lo and behold, it’s working! The political class is having a collective aneurysm. The donor class is clutching its pearls. And the rest of us? Oh, we’re soaking every minute of it.

And surely, it’s a moment. The kind you write bad poetry about. The kind that makes you think, just for a second, that the machine might actually be grinding to a halt.

But let’s not get one thing twisted: none of this—not a single darn inch of it—happened without Gaza.

Oh, I know the list of suspects. COVID, the great unmasker of institutional incompetence. Inflation, that quiet thief. Trump, the human wrecking ball. ICE, the agency with a heart of ice and a budget of blood. Health insurance premiums that make you choose between your house and your heartbeat. AI, the shiny new boot poised to stomp on the last rung of the economic ladder. All of it true. All of it fuel.

But it’s Gaza that lit the match. It’s Gaza that took the vague, diffuse hum of working-class grievance and turned it into a howl. Before the bombs started falling in earnest, we had murmurs. We had op-eds. We had progressive think-pieces about “systemic rot” and “foreign policy blowback.” But it was all abstract—a bad dream you can’t quite remember.

Then came the live feed. The rubble. The children. The unspeakable, day-after-day-until-you-go-numb horror of it. And suddenly, the rot wasn’t theoretical. It wasn’t a metaphor. It was a live, unblinking camera pointed at the moral sewer of Western foreign policy, and for once, people couldn’t look away. Gaza didn’t just crack our skulls; it pried them open. It made our brains porous enough to absorb what we’d spent a lifetime filtering out: that Israel and our own governments aren’t just flawed—they’re fiendishly, arrestingly evil.

And here’s the part that’s going to make the new saviors of the world uncomfortable:

You, the fresh-faced insurgent, the anti-war, anti-billionaire phenom, sitting pretty in your new office, staring at the mahogany, feeling the weight of the chair… That’s the same you who needs to understand, in your bones, that you didn’t get there on mere vibes. You didn’t get there just on policy papers. You got there on the dead bodies of Palestinians. You climbed that ladder rung by rung over the crushed bones of Gaza. You, whether you like it or not, are a child of fortune, the nepo baby of Gaza’s misfortune, and your mandate is written in blood.

So act like it.

Don’t give me the usual D.C. two-step. Don’t roll out the tired, creaky talking points about a “two-state solution” like it’s 1993 and we’re all still naive enough to believe in unicorns. Don’t talk about a Palestine if you’re picturing anything less than River-to-Sea. Don’t you dare stand there with a straight face and talk about holding Israel accountable while you’re still polishing the brass on the Zionist project’s doorknob.

Palestinians handed you the shredded, smoking remains of their toddlers in Gaza—little plastic bags of flesh and bone, delivered by rescue workers who’d given up crying—and you have the gall to stand at a podium and call a two-state solution a victory? A “ceasefire”? Give me a break. You don’t get to return 100 percent of the concentration camp and call it a day. You don’t get to hand back the rubble and the sewage and the sniper towers and pat yourself on the back for statesmanship. Give them back Yaffa—the city they didn’t leave, but were thrown from while British tanks watched and Zionist terror militias drew up maps. Give them back the orange groves, the limestone courtyards, the front doors they still dream about at night. They have the keys. Not symbolic keys. Actual keys. Rusted, bent, inherited, clutched into the fists of grandmothers who still recite the address in their sleep.

And while you’re at it, spare us the diplomatic hand-wringing over “Israel’s right to exist”—as if that has anything to do with anything. As if the refugee in Jenin, or the woman in Shatila, or the kid in Zarqa who’s never seen the sea, is supposed to nod along while you lecture them about realpolitik. They’ve spent fifty, sixty, seventy years rotting in squalor on our dime—U.S. tax dollars, gentlemen, the same ones that fund F-16s and “Iron Dome” interceptors—and you want to offer them autonomy? A statelet? A strip of land with no water, no ports, and Israeli checkpoints every 400 meters? No. Give them back Al Jaleel. Give them back Safad. Give them back Lidd and Haifa. That’s where they’re from. That’s where their great-grandfathers are buried. That’s where the deeds are filed, in Ottoman Turkish and British Mandate English, still legal, still valid, still gathering dust in vaults while the world plays dumb.

Give them the full, unvarnished reverence they are owed—not for their suffering, which we’ve commodified into NGO grants and UNRWA acronyms, but for what we’ve done to them. We’re not talking about a band-aid. We’re not talking about a “roadmap” or a “confidence-building measure” or some State Department communiqué that uses the word “viability” twelve times without ever mentioning justice. We’re talking about historic Palestine—every inch, every stone, every gnarled olive tree that’s been uprooted for another settlement driveway. Give it back. All of it. To the people we’ve spent decades treating like extras in our own grubby, oil-soaked, arms-dealing geopolitical drama—props to be moved, budgets to be cut, casualties to be “regretted” in press briefings.

Give it back to whom it belongs. To the people we have so profoundly, so relentlessly, so enthusiastically wronged for so long that we’ve lost the moral vocabulary to even describe it. And yes—Jews can stay. Of course they can stay. As full equals, with full rights, in a single state where your religion doesn’t determine your ZIP code or your water allotment. But if that prospect terrifies them—if the thought of becoming a minority in their own mythologized homeland sends them into conniptions—then too freaking bad. You don’t get to demand safety for yourself by making everyone else unsafe. You don’t get to call that peace. You don’t get to call that resolution. You don’t get to call that anything but what it is: a continuation, by other means, of the same old theft.

Anything less is a betrayal. And I don’t use that word lightly.

If you get into that office and start humming the old tune, you’ve turned yourself from a promising hero to worse than a Randy Fine. You’ve betrayed the mothers who handed you their children’s souls on a live broadcast. You’ve failed the fathers who dug through rubble with their bare hands while you practiced your acceptance speech. You’ve reneged. You’ve sold them out—again.

Because if you think this moment is a victory, you’re only half-right. It’s a debt. And it’s due.

The Settler-Colonialism Two-Step: Khanna’s Dance With Zionism

Look, I’ll give credit where it’s due. When Ro Khanna calls Gaza a genocide—which he did, co-sponsoring Rashida Tlaib’s resolution in 2025 that officially recognized Israel’s actions as genocidal—he’s saying something real 1. When he went to the West Bank and got blockaded by armed settlers with American-made M4s, he did what every congressperson should do: see the occupation through Palestinian eyes, not the usual wine-and-dine tour where they kiss the Western Wall and come home to write a glowing op-ed 2.

Khanna’s team got surrounded by masked men with rifles. The IDF statement disputes the details—they say troops “dispersed the Israeli civilians” while Khanna says the soldiers sided with the settlers 3. But here’s the thing: even the IDF’s version admits armed settlers blocked a sitting congressman, kicked tires, cursed at them, laughed at them, and the army had to clear the road 3. That’s a horror show, and Khanna was right to call it out.

But here’s where the sincerity check bounces off the wall.

After over a hundred years of Palestinian dispossession—from the Nakba in 1948 to the systematic destruction of hundreds of Palestinian villages—the time for incremental politics is OVER. 4 Khanna wants credit for being “the good one.” The progressive who says the right things but stops short of the finish line.

The BDS Problem

Let’s talk about the big one. Khanna has never supported BDS 5. In fact, he told the Jewish News of Northern California that he’s “unequivocally, since Day 1, condemned ‘globalize the intifada'” and voted to condemn “from the river to the sea” 6.

If you’re not calling for BDS in 2026, you’re a complete fraud. Sorry, not sorry. Any state that does what Israel’s been doing for decades would be sanctioned, and BDS is the only nonviolent tool Palestinians have asked the world to use. It’s the actual, Palestinian-led movement for justice. Khanna opposing it while calling himself a progressive is like saying you support civil rights but you’re against sit-ins.

The Zionism Two-Step

This is where it gets genuinely absurd. Khanna told J. Weekly in October 2025 that he supports Zionism—”self-determination for the Jewish people” and the “right for Israel to exist” 7. He said it’s antisemitic to oppose a Jewish state. Meanwhile, he’s co-sponsoring genocide resolutions and calling for Palestinian statehood 1.

Being pro-Palestine while insisting on the right of a colony built on stealing their land to exist is an oxymoron. It doesn’t fool anyone anymore.

The Two-State Nonsense

If you still advocate for the two-state solution in 2026, please stop talking about Palestine. Your base has moved on. The two-state solution has been a coffin for Palestinian rights for decades. It’s what they wheel out when they want to sound reasonable while the settlements expand—and by the way, the IDF’s own numbers show 700,000 Jews living in settlements illegal under international law 8.

Khanna says he supports a two-state solution but not “Greater Israel” 7. What does that mean in practice? It means more negotiations, more incrementalism, more Palestinian suffering while everyone waits for a “viable state” that’s been made geographically impossible by settlement blocs.

If you’re not calling for the right of all Palestinians to return to all of historic Palestine, for the right of all Palestinians to have full equality with all Israelis, you’re just another Joe Biden with a brown face.

The Politics of Convenience

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: being pro-Palestine is now politically smart for Democrats. It’s not political uranium like it used to be; it’s a political treasure trove. The base has shifted. Polls show 58% of Democrats think the U.S. is “too supportive” of Israel 9. Khanna is eyeing a 2028 presidential run 10. Of course he’s going to climb on the backs of Palestinians to get to higher office.

TrackAIPAC endorsed him after he signed their PEACE Pledge 11. Cute. But what does that actually mean? The group even admitted they only gave him a label saying “We encourage this representative to continue improving their legislative record” 11. Compare that to AOC, who has a green card and a positive label. Khanna is halfway there, but he won’t take the full step.

The Bottom Line

I appreciate Khanna’s words. I appreciate that he went to the West Bank and saw the reality. But words and trips don’t mean a damn thing if you’re not willing to call for complete and actual justice for Palestinians.

That means supporting BDS. That means rejecting Zionism as a settler-colonial project. That means calling for the right of return. That means scrapping the two-state fantasy.

If you’re not there, you’re not going to stop Palestinian suffering. You’re just another politician using their pain to get a promotion. And the Palestinians have had enough of that.


Sources & References

1. Khanna co-sponsored H.Res. 789 (2025) recognizing Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocide. Congress.gov

2. Khanna describes West Bank trip in +972 Magazine interview, July 2026: “This is what every member should see.”

3. IDF statement to The Jerusalem Post, July 10, 2026: “IDF forces arrived, dispersed the Israeli civilians, and allowed the vehicles to continue on their way.” Khanna’s account via CNN: “Settlers detained us; the IDF sided with them.” Jerusalem Post

4. UNRWA data on Palestinian refugees: ~5.9 million registered refugees (2025). Nakba & ongoing dispossession documented by B’Tselem and Al-Haq.

5. Khanna statement to Jewish News of Northern California, June 2025: “I’ve never supported BDS.” J. Weekly

6. Khanna voted in favor of H.Res. 765 (2025) condemning the phrase “from the river to the sea.” Congress.gov

7. Khanna interview with J. Weekly, October 2025: “I support Zionism — self-determination for the Jewish people.” J. Weekly

8. Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics (2025) reports 700,000+ settlers in West Bank. International Court of Justice (2024) advisory opinion: settlements illegal under international law.

9. Pew Research Center (June 2026): “58% of Democrats say U.S. is too supportive of Israel.”

10.Politico (March 2026): “Khanna is actively building infrastructure for a potential 2028 presidential run.”

11. TrackAIPAC PEACE Pledge & Khanna endorsement, July 2026. Label: “We encourage this representative to continue improving their legislative record.” TrackAIPAC

All URLs accessed July 2026. The views expressed are solely those of the author.

How to deal with Bondi (not the pedophile protector one)

They’ll scream at us, and we’ll scream back louder than ever

(This article applies whether the Bondi Beach attack was a psy-op or not)

Let’s be clear about what happened yesterday at Bondi Beach. It was a massacre, a gruesome spectacle of violence that the media will feast on for days. But if you think this was some unforeseeable tragedy, a bolt of lightning from a clear blue sky, you haven’t been paying attention. You’ve been swallowing the official narrative like a free lunch.

Just as the October 7th attack was the grim, predictable outcome of decades of Israeli sadism, ethnic cleansing, and a supremacist ideology that views non-Jews as subhuman, the attack at Bondi was inevitable. It was baked into the cake. You can’t stomp on a people’s face for 75 years, bomb their children into oblivion, starve them, and humiliate them on a daily basis without expecting some of that rage to eventually blow back in horrific, unpredictable ways. And make no mistake, there will be more, and Zionists are praying hard, if not orchestrating, for it. This is not an anomaly; it is the new normal, the logical consequence of a policy of endless, unpunished aggression.

And the response? It’s a script we know by heart. The Israeli propaganda machine, already greased and ready to go, will kick into high gear. Its proxies in Western media and politics will wail about a “new wave of terror,” using the bloodshed to justify their own brutality and paint anyone who dares to question the official narrative as a sympathizer. They will weaponize this tragedy just as they have weaponized every other, to deflect from the genocide they are actively perpetrating.

The last thing any of us should do right now is fall for this. The last thing we should do is let this event distract us, or worse, make us shrink. That is precisely what the Zionists want. They want you to look at the bloody sand in Australia and forget the bloody rubble in Gaza. They want you to be so overwhelmed by their pain that you no longer have the energy to fight for justice for their victims.

So what do we do? We use Bondi to double down. We get louder.

This is the moment to up the ante on exposing Israeli atrocities, both the current live-streamed genocide and the historical record of dispossession and terror that founded the state. We must constantly, relentlessly remind everyone that attacks like Bondi are not the cause of the problem, but a symptom. The focus must shift from the pathetic, predictable chorus of “what a terrible event” to the cold, hard truth: “We told you this would happen if you didn’t change your ways.” This is not about condoning violence; it’s about explaining its origins. It’s about stating, unequivocally, that the blood of these victims is also on the hands of the politicians and ideologues who created the conditions for this to happen.

And we must hammer home the point that anti-Zionism is not antisemitism. This is not a nuance; it is the central battlefield. We need to weave this message into every march, every talk, every social media post. Zionism is a political ideology, a violent, colonial project, and it is no more synonymous with Judaism than fascism is with Italianism. To equate the two is a deliberate, cynical smear tactic designed to shut down all debate.

Furthermore, and just as importantly, we must turn this moment into an opportunity for real talk about value. Ten people die at Bondi, and the world stops. Governments issue solemn statements, flags fly at half-mast, and the media dedicates 24/7 coverage. Tens of thousands of Palestinians are systematically exterminated in Gaza, a genocide funded and armed by the West, and it’s a “complex conflict.” It’s a “tragedy” with “two sides.” To give these ten lives more weight, more outrage, more political capital than the tens of thousands of lives snuffed out by Israeli bombs when they are literally a blip in the totality of carnage is not just biased; it is an act of profound, seething racism. It is the clearest demonstration imaginable of whose life the world deems valuable and whose it deems disposable.

So no, this is not the time to be intimidated. It is not the time to cower in fear of government crackdowns or online mobs. We don’t need to defend ourselves or apologize for what we stand for. The truth is a defense in itself. We already have the majority of the public on our side of the fundamental question: the slaughter in Gaza must stop. Our job is to connect that sentiment to its root cause.

Slowing down now will send the wrong message to Zionists. It will teach them that crimes like Bondi work. It will incentivize them to work with the MI6 and all the other happy-to-oblige intel agencies to commit more. That’s why doubling down on the pro-Palestine message is necessary to prevent future crimes, to save lives!

This is the time to scream from the rooftops how utterly racist it is that the death of a handful of Westerners warrants global action while the industrial-scale slaughter of Palestinians earns a shrug. This is the time to declare, loudly and without apology, that the only path to peace, for Palestinians and for Jews alike, is for the West to finally pull the plug on the rotten, corrupt, and murderous Zionist project. And it is the time to say the one thing they desperately don’t want you to believe: No Jew will ever be truly safe so long as the ideology of Zionism, which conflates Jewish identity with a violent, colonial state, continues to exist. Their project is a death trap, and this is not the time to stop saying so.

So to summarize, our messaging should include the following points:

1- Spare us the crying and focus on the root of the problem. If you won’t, we will.

2- Anyone who’s calling for a dramatic uptick in suppression of pro-Palestine speech while not calling for stopping weapons and intelligence assistance to Israel is not only pro-fascist, but is deeply, brazenly hateful and supremacist toward Arabs, Muslims, and especially Palestinians.

3- In order to prevent future attacks like Bondi and save lives, it is ever more prudent to work on ending Zionism now.

4- Anti-Zionism is not antisemitism and never was. Thousands of Jews, holocaust scholars, and holocaust survivors agree.